Pages

Tuesday 22 March 2011

In what ways can Inglourious Basterds and Fight Club be considered postmodern?

I have been studying the two films: Inglourious Basterds and Fight Club, i think that both of these films are post modern as they both include aspects of what makes a postmodern film.

The film Inglourious Basterds is post modern, because it uses the story telling plot of a fairy tale (this is when it says: “a long time ago” and the story ends in a forest and this is the most common ending in a fairy tale), also the story is broken up into chapters and this strengthens the point of the story plot being based on a fairy tale, this also emphasises that the film is a fairy tale (never happened) and it is being told to a child by their parents or grandparents and the story is told in a personalised way as everything goes to plan and Hitler is killed in a horrific manor, glorifying the death of Hitler. I think that some of the scenes in this film were aimed towards Jews such as the killing of Hitler (this scene is about one of the Inglourious Basterds over-killing Hitler corpse on the floor and he was shooting Hitler in the face, this is bloody violence and gore. Another point to suggest that some of the scenes in the film are aimed at Jews is the humiliation of Hitler as there is a scene when Hitler has a paddy and screams: Nien, nien, nien.... like a little child.

The next point for why Inglourios Basterds is postmodern is the violence that is used, this is because the violence in the film is so exaggerated that it makes the audience laugh, which is a postmodern thing to do as it forces the audience to laugh at something that we would not normally laugh at e.g. when the Bear Jew smashes the Nazi’s skull in with a baseball bat, this violence is pushed so far that it does not seem to be real and it make the audience laugh. Another example would be Hugo Stiglitz in the bar scene when he stabs a German in the back of the head repeatedly, although this clip is horrific it seems to be so far away from reality it is comical.

Next the songs that are played in the film are postmodern as they were all made after the time period of the film (WWII) and also some of the songs genres do not fit in with the story of a war, an example of this would be the spaghetti western (Mystic and Severe by Ennio Morricone) song, this song is out of its year time line. This makes the audience confused as they notice that the song does not fit the film and it gives the effect of the time line being mixed up and the effect of the music creates an atmosphere of the music genre.

Another point that suggests that Inglourious Basterds is postmodern is the personalisation of tarantion’s foot fetish, this is shown in scenes such as when Col. Hans Landa puts on Bridget’s shoe and this is also a link to the fairy tale as it is similar to Cinderella.

In the film there is a film within a film and this is called: ‘The Nations Pride’ and it celebrates Frederick Zoller’s triumph over the Americans, the film within a film is an extremely postmodern thing to do as it reminds the audience that they are watching a film, and another post modern element in Inglourious Basterds that reminds that audience that they are watching a film is when the set walls are revealed and this is typical of Tarantino as he uses this technique in Kill Bill and Pulp Fiction (two of his other films). The method of telling the audience / reminding them in a film is a postmodern method.

The next film that can be considered post modern is Fight Club and this is because it includes elements such as: subliminal messages, breaks the fourth wall, self reflexive, copy of a copy of a copy and so on...

The first post modern point about Fight Club is that it is a film that is not trying to be real, but by adding all of the elements and the effects of realistic topics, like the sound of a punch it is therefore realistic. This is post modern because it is something that is real but it is not and it is not trying to be realistic so therefore it is realistic.

The next post modern point in this film is the subliminal messages that are used as they show the audience a brief clip for something like 2 milliseconds and this makes the audience remember that message later on in the film. The subliminal messages that we see as an audience are of Tyler Durden and as the story progresses the audience is introduced to Tyler and they remember him from the film although he has not been in the story yet, this is a post modern thing to do as it is challenging the audience and deliberately confusing them.

Next there are intertextualities in the film for example when Tyler shouts ‘Run Forrest Run!’ at the back of the store, this is taking a text from a pre existing film and then using it in a different text in Fight Club and this is also known as ‘a copy of a copy of a copy’

Another postmodern point in this film would be when Ed Nortons character looks around his flat and there are labels of all of the furniture giving their name and the price that they cost, this is a postmodern aspect as it is displaying unreal elements and it is reminding the audience that they are watching a film and it also fits into the moral of the story and it is all about what we will tolerate as being real or unreal and this is tolerated as being unrealistic.

Also another post modern element in this film is near the end when the audience find out what Ed Nortons characters name is (Tyler Durden), this then sends his memory back into a flash back of all of the events that have happened with him and Tyler and it has replaced all of Tylers actions with Ed Norton and it shows the audience that he is a skitso and has a split personality with Brad Pit as what he wants to be, this then confuses that audience and makes them rethink about the whole story and this is a postmodern technique because it is challenging the audiences knowledge.

Monday 21 March 2011

post modernism

Dan Black
- participation (anyone can make this song by using garage band and having the star man song)
- modification (anyone can modify the beats per second in the tunes)
- authenticity disrupter (the song can be remade, but the lyrics and the tune will be out of sync)
- originality (this is a copy of two songs and the video is a copy of a series of films so therefore it is a brickolage and a copy of a copy.
- knowing how to make it and knowing that it is easier to produce, makes it less impressive as anyone can make the song and the tune

DJ Shadow
- participation (
- modification (
- disrupter (
- originality (this is original as there are short 10 second sound from songs pre-existing so they all mix into one original song
- knowing how to make it does not affect how impressive it is as it is extremely difficult to mix all of the tunes together at once.


Daft Punk


Monday 7 March 2011

why scott pilgrim vs the world failed at the box office

Scott Pilgrim vs the world failed at the box office and this was because of the nature and intertextuality that is in the film. Scott Pilgrim is aimed at a the nerdy teenaged being, but there is a problem with the target audience of this film as most of the references are too old for most of the aimed audience to know what it is and an example of this would be Seinfeld (this was an American hit comedy TV series), but it was cancelled and removed off of the air before the target audience for the film was even born and this means that the audience to understand this intertextuality would have to be 20 – 30 years of age and this is not the target audience for the film. Another reason for why Scott Pilgrim flopped in the box office is because people have a special hate for the actor who plays Scott and he is Michael Cera, people hate Michael because he plays the same character in all of the films that he has starred in and there is no difference in Scott Pilgrim vs the world. Then the film does not have a clear story line as it is basically Scott plays in band, finds a girl he likes and then has to kill 7 evil ex’s and all of the evil ex’s have ridiculous weaknesses such as being a super vegan and Scott gives him a bottle of cow’s milk to kill him, this storyline is not clear to anyone in the audience as it seems to be random and stupidly pointless. In the film there are too many references to other existing media, this is clear as there is even a pee bar when Scott goes to the toilet, also the super vegan is a reference to the animated TV series called Dragon Ball Z and in all of the fights there are speed lines used in all animated TV series. Most of the audience is put off of the film because of the geeky stereotype that has grown on the reputation of this film and this means that everyone who is not a geek thinks that the storyline is all about geeks / nerds playing card games, world of war craft in a dark sweaty basement, but the storyline of the film is not about that at all it is about 20-ish year old douche bags performing songs and Scott is trying to decide what girl to sleep with and he is planning all of his spare time working out what evil ex he will be killing next.

Scott Pilgrim vs the world flopped at the box office because of there being such a narrow / specific target audience that does not exist as the target audience does not understand any of the intertextualities because they are too young to understand the references.